The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm (2024)

Abstract

Quite remarkably, the two physical theories that describe extremely well physical phenomena on the largest and smallest distance scales in our universe, viz. general relativity and quantum theory, respectively, are radically disparate. Both theories are now almost a century old and have passed with flying colours every test to which they have been put, but they seem to be telling us completely different stories about the nature of physical reality. Loosely formulated, general relativity is a local, deterministic, background independent theory, while quantum theory is fundamentally nonlocal, indeterministic and background dependent, with experiments moreover putting very strong constraints on any interpretation of the quantum world that is more akin to general relativity in the first two respects.This thesis is essentially a detailed and critical review of both these fundamental theories, as well as the further developments they spawned. Regarding the first aspect, issues such as the historical emergence and conceptual foundations of both theories are crucially dealt with, while notions such as black holes, the thermodynamic arrow of time, applications of quantum theory to field systems, renormalization theory and the standard models of modern cosmology and particle physics are key to the second aspect. Two other equally important and related, but so far critically unresolved issues in this latter regard revolve around the question of how to interpret the quantum formalism and the problem of how to integrate both theories into an overall unified framework a so called theory of quantum gravity. In dealing with these issues, the discussion includes fairly comprehensive and critical treatments of constructs as esoteric as string M-theory, the anthropic landscape and parallel quantum universes, as well as apparently somewhat more worldly ideas, such as loop quantum gravity, Bohmian beables, and the quantum-classical cut. Although the upshot of these discussions is that there are good reasons to think that both quantum theory and general relativity will have to undergo subtle, but profound revisions before a successful, even-handed quantum gravity scheme can be formulated, the status of quantum theory is specifically focussed upon here. Indeed, one of the main conclusions of the present work is that quantum theory, in spite of all its triumphant empirical confirmations, is most presumably an approximate theory.

Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Utrecht University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Dieks, Dennis, Primary supervisor
Award date8 Oct 2014
Publisher
  • Utrecht University
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2014

Keywords

  • foundations of modern physics
  • interpretations of quantum theory
  • quantum gravity

    Embargoed Document

  • holman

    Final published version, 4.85 MB

    Embargo ends: 8/10/24

    Request copy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

View full fingerprint

Cite this

  • APA
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • Harvard
  • Standard
  • RIS
  • Vancouver

Holman, M. (2014). The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm. [Doctoral thesis 1 (Research UU / Graduation UU), Utrecht University]. Utrecht University.

Holman, Marc. / The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm. Utrecht University, 2014. 702 p.

@phdthesis{fae2387f21314075b29d6ee280054995,

title = "The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm",

abstract = "Quite remarkably, the two physical theories that describe extremely well physical phenomena on the largest and smallest distance scales in our universe, viz. general relativity and quantum theory, respectively, are radically disparate. Both theories are now almost a century old and have passed with flying colours every test to which they have been put, but they seem to be telling us completely different stories about the nature of physical reality. Loosely formulated, general relativity is a local, deterministic, background independent theory, while quantum theory is fundamentally nonlocal, indeterministic and background dependent, with experiments moreover putting very strong constraints on any interpretation of the quantum world that is more akin to general relativity in the first two respects. This thesis is essentially a detailed and critical review of both these fundamental theories, as well as the further developments they spawned. Regarding the first aspect, issues such as the historical emergence and conceptual foundations of both theories are crucially dealt with, while notions such as black holes, the thermodynamic arrow of time, applications of quantum theory to field systems, renormalization theory and the standard models of modern cosmology and particle physics are key to the second aspect. Two other equally important and related, but so far critically unresolved issues in this latter regard revolve around the question of how to interpret the quantum formalism and the problem of how to integrate both theories into an overall unified framework a so called theory of quantum gravity. In dealing with these issues, the discussion includes fairly comprehensive and critical treatments of constructs as esoteric as string M-theory, the anthropic landscape and parallel quantum universes, as well as apparently somewhat more worldly ideas, such as loop quantum gravity, Bohmian beables, and the quantum-classical cut. Although the upshot of these discussions is that there are good reasons to think that both quantum theory and general relativity will have to undergo subtle, but profound revisions before a successful, even-handed quantum gravity scheme can be formulated, the status of quantum theory is specifically focussed upon here. Indeed, one of the main conclusions of the present work is that quantum theory, in spite of all its triumphant empirical confirmations, is most presumably an approximate theory.",

keywords = "foundations of modern physics, interpretations of quantum theory, quantum gravity",

author = "Marc Holman",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

day = "8",

language = "English",

publisher = "Utrecht University",

type = "Doctoral thesis 1 (Research UU / Graduation UU)",

school = "Utrecht University",

}

Holman, M 2014, 'The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm', Doctor of Philosophy, Utrecht University.

The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm. / Holman, Marc.
Utrecht University, 2014. 702 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral thesis 1 (Research UU / Graduation UU)

TY - THES

T1 - The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm

AU - Holman, Marc

PY - 2014/10/8

Y1 - 2014/10/8

N2 - Quite remarkably, the two physical theories that describe extremely well physical phenomena on the largest and smallest distance scales in our universe, viz. general relativity and quantum theory, respectively, are radically disparate. Both theories are now almost a century old and have passed with flying colours every test to which they have been put, but they seem to be telling us completely different stories about the nature of physical reality. Loosely formulated, general relativity is a local, deterministic, background independent theory, while quantum theory is fundamentally nonlocal, indeterministic and background dependent, with experiments moreover putting very strong constraints on any interpretation of the quantum world that is more akin to general relativity in the first two respects.This thesis is essentially a detailed and critical review of both these fundamental theories, as well as the further developments they spawned. Regarding the first aspect, issues such as the historical emergence and conceptual foundations of both theories are crucially dealt with, while notions such as black holes, the thermodynamic arrow of time, applications of quantum theory to field systems, renormalization theory and the standard models of modern cosmology and particle physics are key to the second aspect. Two other equally important and related, but so far critically unresolved issues in this latter regard revolve around the question of how to interpret the quantum formalism and the problem of how to integrate both theories into an overall unified framework a so called theory of quantum gravity. In dealing with these issues, the discussion includes fairly comprehensive and critical treatments of constructs as esoteric as string M-theory, the anthropic landscape and parallel quantum universes, as well as apparently somewhat more worldly ideas, such as loop quantum gravity, Bohmian beables, and the quantum-classical cut. Although the upshot of these discussions is that there are good reasons to think that both quantum theory and general relativity will have to undergo subtle, but profound revisions before a successful, even-handed quantum gravity scheme can be formulated, the status of quantum theory is specifically focussed upon here. Indeed, one of the main conclusions of the present work is that quantum theory, in spite of all its triumphant empirical confirmations, is most presumably an approximate theory.

AB - Quite remarkably, the two physical theories that describe extremely well physical phenomena on the largest and smallest distance scales in our universe, viz. general relativity and quantum theory, respectively, are radically disparate. Both theories are now almost a century old and have passed with flying colours every test to which they have been put, but they seem to be telling us completely different stories about the nature of physical reality. Loosely formulated, general relativity is a local, deterministic, background independent theory, while quantum theory is fundamentally nonlocal, indeterministic and background dependent, with experiments moreover putting very strong constraints on any interpretation of the quantum world that is more akin to general relativity in the first two respects.This thesis is essentially a detailed and critical review of both these fundamental theories, as well as the further developments they spawned. Regarding the first aspect, issues such as the historical emergence and conceptual foundations of both theories are crucially dealt with, while notions such as black holes, the thermodynamic arrow of time, applications of quantum theory to field systems, renormalization theory and the standard models of modern cosmology and particle physics are key to the second aspect. Two other equally important and related, but so far critically unresolved issues in this latter regard revolve around the question of how to interpret the quantum formalism and the problem of how to integrate both theories into an overall unified framework a so called theory of quantum gravity. In dealing with these issues, the discussion includes fairly comprehensive and critical treatments of constructs as esoteric as string M-theory, the anthropic landscape and parallel quantum universes, as well as apparently somewhat more worldly ideas, such as loop quantum gravity, Bohmian beables, and the quantum-classical cut. Although the upshot of these discussions is that there are good reasons to think that both quantum theory and general relativity will have to undergo subtle, but profound revisions before a successful, even-handed quantum gravity scheme can be formulated, the status of quantum theory is specifically focussed upon here. Indeed, one of the main conclusions of the present work is that quantum theory, in spite of all its triumphant empirical confirmations, is most presumably an approximate theory.

KW - foundations of modern physics

KW - interpretations of quantum theory

KW - quantum gravity

M3 - Doctoral thesis 1 (Research UU / Graduation UU)

PB - Utrecht University

ER -

Holman M. The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm. Utrecht University, 2014. 702 p.

The Quest for a Fundamental Theory of Physics - Rise and Demise of the Field Paradigm (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 5547

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.